Treatment of Women in John Stuart Mills The Subjection of...

John Stuart Mill is a British philosopher who argued for the emancipation of women and recognition of their legal rights. In his essay The Subjection of Women he calls for the social and legal equality for women. He writes about women having equal rights as men and implies that if women were given the same opportunities as men then they would feel as human as the rest of mankind. Women in his culture were treated differently than men, but he says that if they were treated the same then women now would probably have the same opportunities as men and it would not be seen as something that is not the social norm for women to do. With women being treated similar to men the roles and status of women would have been different in his culture as well as in ours, women would not be seen as only caretakers nor would women be seen so inferior to men because they would be seen as capable of doing many things. Also, because of the way women were treated in earlier times, it does seem possible tha t one may experience the sense of not being a human being like any other. During the time that Mill lived women in his culture were treated much more differently than how women are treated today. If people from his time saw how women are treated today they would probably think that there is something wrong with society because women were only supposed to be in the home and they should not have the same opportunities or rights as men do because the male was dominant and women were inferior toShow MoreRelatedUtilitarian Perspective On Feminism1563 Words   |  7 PagesRights John Stuart Mill’s discussion of the subjection of women leaves many scholars regarding him as one of the first feminist philosophers of his time. His work analyzes and questions the everyday perspectives on women’s rights, and challenges common societal notions. Many philosophers today look to his work for a variety of reasons; some applaud his work for being ahead of it’s time. Others dismiss it, claiming that it’s flawed due to personal attachment. Both sides however regard Mill’s writingRead MoreJohn Stuart Mills Analysis Of The Oppression Of Women947 Words   |  4 Pages The Subjection of Women looks at the society and its struggles in adjusting to an environment where women are treated equally. John Stuart Mill’s approach to changing society comes from the viewpoint that after many years of submission and discrimination, women should be treated equally. This conclusion comes from a reflection on past classes of people that were simil arly oppressed. Mill looks at similar situations throughout history where one certain group was dominant over another submissive groupRead MoreOver The Course History, There Has Been A Gradual Progression1423 Words   |  6 Pages Over the course history, there has been a gradual progression towards obtaining universal civil rights for all people regardless of race, religion, gender, or culture. Certain individuals, such as Abraham Lincoln, John Stuart Mill, and Christine de Pizan have left permanent marks on public opinion because of their large and effective contributions to that progress. The tone and method of the arguments they made for the attainment of universal human rights have cemented its advancement. Even thoughRead MoreA Study on Metafictive Devices in the French Lieutenant’s Woman5819 Words   |  24 PagesA Study on Metafictive Devices in The French Lieutenant’s Woman Abstract The French Lieutenant’s Woman is a splendid literary work written by English novelist John Fowles. It was published in 1969 and received universally acknowledged reputation as a masterpiece of postmodern novel. With intricate plot, the novel is regarded as a compelling historiographic metafiction in contemporary British literature. The characteristics of this novel are the metafictive devices employed by the authorRead MoreThe Philosophy of Happiness11705 Words   |  47 Pagesthe supreme good and the supreme pleasure, Aristotle entitles himself to be called a hedonist: but he is a hedonist of a very unusual kind, and stands at a great distance from the most famous hedonist in ancient Greece, namely Epicurus. Epicurus’ treatment of pleasure is less sophisticated, but also more easily intelligible than Aristotle’s. He is willing to place a value on pleasure that is independent of the value of the activity enjoyed: all pleasure is, as such, good. For Epicurus, pleasure is